This Post Is Recently Updated on Dec 24, 2023 @ 0:06 am by TBB Desk
The political landscape of Pakistan is complex and multifaceted, with the Baloch question standing as a critical indicator of the country’s stance on democracy and human rights. This issue was brought into sharp focus following a recent event where a peaceful, unarmed caravan of protesters, starting from Turbat, made their way towards Islamabad only to face a violent rebuttal at the capital’s threshold. This march, known as the Baloch Long March, has become a symbol of the democratic aspirations and the struggle for human rights within Pakistan, particularly for the Baloch people.
The Baloch Long March, which saw thousands of participants including women, men, and children, along with political workers from various ethnic backgrounds, was a significant mobilization effort. The march, led predominantly by young women, wove through the diverse regions of Balochistan, the Seraiki, Pakhtun, and Punjabi heartlands, showcasing a united front for democratic aspirations and the idea of a voluntary federation. The demands of the marchers were clear yet profound: an end to enforced disappearances and ‘encounter killings’, a practice triggering initial protests in Turbat, and accountability for those complicit in such acts. These demands, while straightforward, represent a challenge to the existing power structures in Pakistan and are seen as unpalatable by those in authority.
The response to the peaceful demonstration as it reached the outskirts of Islamabad was telling. Instead of being allowed to voice their concerns, the protesters were met with baton charges, water cannons, and detentions. This forceful response is not only a commentary on the state’s approach to dissent but also highlights the broader issues of freedom of expression and assembly in the country. The article draws a parallel with the disaffection among Bengalis leading to the creation of Bangladesh, suggesting a pattern of systemic oppression and its long-term consequences.
In the backdrop of these events, the political maneuvers of mainstream Pakistani parties present a stark contrast. While these parties were busy courting electables from Balochistan, the grassroots movement represented by the march was largely sidelined. The author points out the irony of the caretaker prime minister, hailing from Balochistan, taking “urgent notice” of the crackdown, implying a disconnect between political rhetoric and on-ground realities.
The incident with the Baloch Long March is indicative of a larger problem within Pakistan – the challenge of integrating democratic principles and human rights into governance. The response to the march reflects a broader reluctance to engage with dissenting voices, particularly from marginalized communities. Moreover, the treatment of the Baloch protestors compared to other groups in Pakistan underscores the ethnic and regional disparities that plague the country. This incident might deepen the alienation among the Baloch people and exacerbate existing tensions with the Pakistani state.
Looking forward, the author emphasizes the need for a broader democratic struggle that prioritizes the most oppressed and marginalized groups. The solidarity expressed during the march suggests potential for a more inclusive political movement. However, there is skepticism about the willingness of mainstream politicians to challenge the status quo, pointing to the need for a grassroots movement to advocate for genuine change.
In conclusion, the Baloch Long March is a reflection of the ongoing struggle for human rights and democratic governance in Pakistan. The state’s response to such movements is crucial not just for addressing specific grievances but also for shaping the broader political and social fabric of the country. How Pakistan handles these internal conflicts will significantly impact its journey towards becoming a more inclusive and democratic society, with implications for its international relations and regional stability.
